Hi Nico, lol... which broken mailer are you using? I guess it's time to alert their security address ;)
Rainer > -----Original Message----- > From: Nico Golde [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 2:36 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] a question about e-mails > > Hallo Chris, > > * Chris Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-26 13:50]: > > > I have a question for it experts. I want to learn if > there is any way of > > > understanding/finding the e-mail addresses at BCC part on > an e-mail that is > > > send to you. > > > > > > Thanks for your consideration. > > > > Um, AFAIK the headers are stripped by the MTA on delivery > to recipients > > (except perhaps the recipient who was listed in the BCC > field, but I'm not > > sure and will most likely vary between MTA). > > > > I'm sure the SMTP RFC would probably help out on this. > > I tested it on my system. > i send a mail to nico and bcc root. > here is the mail header: > From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 26 14:28:30 2004 > Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Received: by > via sendmail from stdin > id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Debian Smail3.2.0.114) > Thu, 26 Feb 2004 14:28:30 +0100 (CET) > Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 14:28:30 +0100 > From: Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: nico > Bcc: root > > ^^^^^^^^^ > here is the bcc line > > > Subject: test > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > [...] > regards nico > -- > Nico Golde nico <at> ngolde <dot> de > public key available on: > http://www.ngolde.de/gpg.html > echo "[q]sa[ln0=aln256%Pln256/snlbx]sb729901041524823122snlbxq"|dc > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
