[EMAIL PROTECTED] replied to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > The only problem with that theory is that VMS *had* a security design, and > there isn't one in NT. The only design overlap there is that Microsoft got > some of the VMS design team to come on board for Win/NT. NT got stuck with > having to be backward-combatable with Win 3.1, and you can fill in the blanks > from there....
Methinks you confuse "design" with "default configuration". NT 3.1 had a reasonable security design at its core, but an OOTB installation produced a security configuration "compatible with Win3.x". Regards, Nick FitzGerald _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
