-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
In my opinion, it would be too easy to create false "Webs of Trust" through something like Orkut. I personally have people on my friends list that I've never actually met in person.
/**************************/ /* Troy Solo */ /* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> */ /* Ignotum per Ignotius */ /**************************/
Harry Hoffman wrote: | That brings up an interesting question. Does anyone out there think that PGP | "web of trusts" would be easier if encorporated into something like "Orkut" or | "Friendster"? | | Obviously, those types of sites would need to evolve (change) it order to more | easily facilitate a trust but it could possibly be doable. | | Just a thought, | Harry | | Quoting Kurt Seifried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: | | *> | *> This thread is dead. It was dead when it was started. It was dead 3 years | *> ago. | *> | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFAQCOCmaXTPtvAkS0RAvKbAKCILDCAUry8AqfU5iU5mAEl03p/tgCdEVEz WUPqGsAAYs5roBFq1nfr0i8= =cGqG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
