On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 16:09:21 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Your points are well taken and understandable. But if you are supporting > a M$ operating system enough to need to read the SB's, then wouldnt your > IE be up to date to read them? Even if you would just use IE to read M$'s > site? To sit and scream about web design decisions in this mailing group > seems a little childish. And if one was to argue that "Aanyone needs to > read these articles not just people that support M$ OS's", well to > that...most people that have a M$ OS as an end user have auto update > turned on and dont even think twice about it...if they update at all.
I took Nick's comments differently. The way I understood it, the problem is that Microsoft forces you to use a scripting language to read a security article. A scripting language could have security problems. As a result, many people have JavaScript disabled for security reasons, regardless of their version of IE. I agree with Nick. It is ironic and unfortunate that MS would force users to turn on a potentially unsafe scripting language to read a security bulletin. -- Troy _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
