Spam detection software, running on the system "cw-1.crocker.com", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or block
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Dear Florian Weimer, It's different thing. Any
infrastructure based on Windows is under risk. But it's not because
VoIP uses ASN.1. --Wednesday, February 18, 2004, 12:32:10 AM, you wrote
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [...]
Content analysis details: (6.5 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
1.9 FROM_NO_LOWER 'From' has no lower-case characters
0.3 FROM_HAS_MIXED_NUMS From: contains numbers mixed in with letters
1.5 BODY_8BITS BODY: Body includes 8 consecutive 8-bit characters
1.9 DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12 Date: is 6 to 12 hours after Received: date
0.8 PRIORITY_NO_NAME Message has priority setting, but no X-Mailer
--- Begin Message ---
Dear Florian Weimer,
It's different thing. Any infrastructure based on Windows is under risk.
But it's not because VoIP uses ASN.1.
--Wednesday, February 18, 2004, 12:32:10 AM, you wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
FW> 3APA3A wrote:
>> ASN.1 is used by many services, but all use different underlying
>> protocols. It's not likely NetMeeting or MS ISA server to be primary
>> attack targets. Attack against MS IPSec implementation, Exchange,
>> SMB/CIFS, RPC services, IIS and specially IE will no have impact to VoIP
>> infrastructure (except connectivity degradation because of massive
>> traffic).
FW> I wish your assessment were true, but it's not. Cisco Call Manager is
FW> based on Windows, and Cisco still has to certify the patches Microsoft
FW> released.
FW> It's sad that Microsoft apparently hasn't used those six months to
FW> properly coordinate the issue with OEM vendors.
--
~/ZARAZA
Ну а теперь, Уильям, хорошенько поразмыслите над данным письмом. (Твен)
--- End Message ---
