-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 17 March 2004 08:19, Jos Osborne wrote: > >It doesn't address the issue. The requirement is that some MS customers > > need to patch without putting the machine on the internet. For whatever > > reasons. > > > >Is that such an unreasonable request? > > > >Geo. > > Sorry to sound incredibly dense, but if the machine in question is never > being connected to a network does it really need securing/patching? > > Jos
Not every network is part of the Internet... The MOST 'at risk' servers are those with security requirements that forbid Internet access, but need LAN/WAN connectivity. The attackers are /inside/... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAWIA7Ji2cv3XsiSARAg5yAKCZ+mBeJcH7w3rsm00QLSLvjEcl2QCfa8Si PTG8z83alcwvejfQEECN1qw= =zS6G -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
