On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 11:41:46 -0500, Cael Abal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "Dan's proposal is intrinsically flawed. It incorrectly assumes that the > sender can reasonably anticipate the recipient's needs in replying to > the message, and that such needs can reasonably be lumped into either > "reply" or "followup". It doesn't solve the real problem, which is that > responders need to think about where their replies go. Mail-Followup-To > won't decrease the number of messages that go to the wrong place."
But you can at least tell people if you want or need a separate copy in addition to what gets sent to the list. People who don't want separate copies should be setting mail-followup-to. Even if not all mail clients support it some do. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
