-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Joshua Brindle wrote:
| | So I ask grsecurity fans, why would you run the software of someone | no better than the people trying to crack your machine? This is | not responsible behaviour and shows a clear disregard for security | and safety of others. |
Whatever. It shows a clear disregard for people using half-solutions which don't work. This is normal behavior. The fact is that grsecurity is a hundred times better then the alternatives - and anyone using the alternatives has made some sort of comprimise that leaves them open to attack, and probably already knows it.
- -dave
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFAZJ8vzOrqAtg8JS8RAsABAJ9qjky3R90wRGrNIF1iZxqiDJ/L4ACdGIvO xOLzWTRu6Yv3qxspq9csKL8= =rBXh -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
