> what about the wasted time/bandwidth for messages like this
Yes, I included examples. -----Original Message----- From: "Mike Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Luke Norman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2004 19:36:50 -0400 Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: [FD] FD should block attachments > > > > >>am i missing something here? > >> because i realy do not see the issue. > >> > > > >Yes, you are > >As far as I can see from the numerous postings on the list, the issue > >isn't really recieving virii or anything else, it's the wasted > >time/bandwidth etc etc that comes from attatchments, and the costs that > > >places on users who pay by the minute or by the megabyte. I personally > >don't think attatchments should be stopped, but I believe that's the > >argument for their filtering? > >Luke > > Having followed this list for the previous year, I can not say > that any and all possible attachments waste any more time than some of > the conversations that take place. It gets ridiculous... For me, it's > down to about 1 of every 10 threads and 1 of every 25 posts that holds > any interest of useful information... Those are approaching my unusable > limits.... > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
