Thankx On Tue, 11 May 2004 15:34:19 +0100 Rob Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 193.x.x.x isnt internal,,, is it? > > > > > > --On Monday, May 10, 2004 12:16 PM +0200 fd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I'd remove something from the mailer: > > > Received: from [192.168.195.2] ([193.7.145.26]) > > > > Why? Not all of us care about disclosing "internal" IP addresses. :) > > > > -J > > > > > > -- > > Jeff Workman | http://www.pimpworks.org/nigritude-ultramarine.html > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html > > > > > > > -- > This email may contain confidential and privileged information for the > sole use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by others > is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please > contact the sender and delete all copies of this email message. > > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html > > -- This email may contain confidential and privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies of this email message. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
