Hi, this is weird. A donation service for a criminal. Published by anonymous mail.
"After all, SASSER was intended as a harmless wake-up call to the world." Sasser had been a violation of applicable law in Germany. As such the intention is totally irrelevant. "Imagine what could happen if this had been done by criminals with no respect for the public." Sasser *has* been done by criminals with no respect for the public. Don't tell me that the Sasser author hasn't been aware of the consequences his work caused. Sasser has caused damages and violated German law. As such the author is subject to claims by victims and the German prosecution. Period. I find your "explanation" why this author of a virus should be treated any different than other authors somehow illogical. The Sasser author has done nothing to foster security. So there is really no need for the security scene to support him. regards, Tobias W. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
