And now a thread springs to life on some guys auto reply................ffs
:-| > I hate it when ppl have a big bitch and cry on a full disclosure post. > > > Hi Andrew, > > > > On Mon, 2004-05-03 at 03:04, Andrew wrote: > >> It's an autoreply, he won't be back at his office until the 10th of May. > >> Yep well thanks a heap Michael J�ger for letting us all know, I'm sure > >> it was important to impart the information, especially in a different > >> language. > > > > Well, I guess TWO stupid people are responsible for this thing landing > > in the list ;-) This J�ger guy who shouldn't use auto-reply in this way > > anyway and some idiot who made a "reply to all" on one of J�ger's list > > mails. > > > > I really hate it when people reply to all. You receive mails twice and > > it is just plain rude in terms of "nettiquette". Another very stupid > > thing is to start a new thread by answering a mail from another thread. > > Very many people do that on this list. It just sucks. It almost makes > > sorting mails in the better EMail-Readers (like Evolution) an obsolete > > feature. > > > > Tobias > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html > > > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html > > > ________ Information from NOD32 ________ > This message was checked by NOD32 Antivirus System for Linux Mail Server. > part000.txt - is OK > http://www.nod32.com > > __________ NOD32 1.749 (20040503) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > http://www.nod32.com > > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
