> 1. Would an exploit like this be said to be severe? yes i assume from your email that the url would have to recofig the server from the scratch then not serious but if any file can be deleted then it is serious
> 2. Is the vendor right in their approach to this issue? no, the vendor should release a full advisory about this and at a minimum release the patch for this > 3. How do I make public the vulnerability? (Vendor has given > permission for > the same) google around the rain forest puppy's disclosure policy for this, it is really good for this > 4. Ok, I'll rather ask... *should* I make public details of this > vulnerability? (Since I know of sites using this app server, and > they may be > taken down if the exploit goes out) > don't make it public without giving all the people affected a chance to protect their system, however you may release something like a one line description of this and *not* give details to anyone except the vendor -aditya ________________________________________________________________________ Delivered using the Free Personal Edition of Mailtraq (www.mailtraq.com) _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
