Exactly -- how can we trust a test where the company that conducted it,
and therefor designed the test is the product that won. Now, of the
vendor tests I've seen conducted by a competitor, this one seemed pretty
honest (Nessus scored very high). However, they didn't test Retina 5 --
which from what I hear is supposed to be a very big improvement. When I
get ahold of it, I'd be happy to run some tests against Nessus.
Thank You,
Christopher Blume
Anders B Jansson wrote:
And to everyones surprise their own product came out on top!
Wow, it has to be good, film at 11
// anders
Alexander wrote:
Hi all!
Comparison of Network Security Scanners:
http://www.maxpatrol.com/pd_cmp2.asp
In this survey the following products were tested:
1 IS - Internet Scanner 7.0 Internet Security Systems
http://www.iss.net
2 LG - LanGuard 3.2 GFI
http://www.gfi.com
3 Ns - Nessus 2.0.6 Renaud Deraison<
http://www.nessus.org
4 NR - NetRecon 3.6 Symantec
http://www.symantec.com
5 Rt - Retina 4.9.97 eEye Digital Security
http://www.eeye.com
6 MP - MaxPatrol 7.0 Positive Technologies
http://www.maxpatrol.com
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
