On Monday 12 July 2004 20:52, st3ng4h wrote: > On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 07:14:02PM +0200, David Huecking wrote: > > Hmm, very funny modified BMPs?! > > [snip] > > > So we see the true nature of this picture. > > This is precisely the point that almost everyone is missing > completely (but still clamoring "it works on X, it doesn't work on > Y"), and that Sapheriel pinpointed: the core problem lies in the > Windows .bmp implementation.
Well, _if_ it does. What is actually happening is that you load a graphic with a massive resolution. Linking to a page with a 4400 MB jpeg isn't exactly what I'd call a DoS, but the effect sure looks like it though ;-) However... maybe I was jumping to conclusions too quick... Since, for the record, Mozilla on linux doesn't suffer anything. Or so it seems. Maarten -- Yes of course I'm sure it's the red cable. I guarante[^%!/+)F#0c|'NO CARRIER _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
