Stormwalker claimed: ****************************** Quoted from this website: "This web site represents the effort of one person. I need your help to offset the costs associated with site hosting and bandwidth usage. If you find this site informative please help by clicking here"
One man's opinion is hardly proof. ******************************* What a wonderful way to discredit a website that contains in it's 'intent': http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/intent.htm /begin quoted text What are your sources? Wire-services, international press, readers, etc, etc..... Exactly the same wire-services used by corporate media. The information contained in this web site is content that other U.S. news sources prefer not to provide to the American public. Why do you believe that the public should trust you as a news source over more commercial sources? I don't believe that readers should trust any source of information. Readers should gather information from alternate sources and use their own intellect and judgment of the content to form opinions. My purpose on this website is to inform, to offer information. Unlike corporate media, I believe that people are capable of making their own judgments, using their own intellectual ability rather than been led around by the nose by "reliable sources" who claim to offer the "truth". /end quoted text Your comment that 'One man's opinion is hardly proof' seems a tad inane doesn't it? After all, the content of the site is *not* 'one man's opinion'. It is a collection of articles from mainstream media agencies, not one man's opinion. If you read the text you quoted, it says 'one man's effort', it says absolutely nothing about 'opinion'. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
