Gary E. Miller wrote:
I guess I must now bow to you superior scholarship?
Well....if you feel you must, although I'd have a lot more fun, if you proved me wrong with some verifiable leads supporting your initial statement:
No thanks, given all the virii that the Feds already tell the US anti-virus companies NOT to detect I'll put my money on global free enterprise.
Once again, you can lead a horse to water, but...
You can't make him wear a tinfoil hat? ;-)
No, seriously, I wouldn't put it past our current administration and the tinfoil hat wearers at the FBI (yes, they got theirs too) or worse, the jackboot wearers at the FBI (and elsewhere at the fed), to fantasize about pushing such a dictum upon the US AV vendors (not even crediting that a significant portion of the AV market is held by non-US vendors), but realistically, it seems unlikely they'd be successful in such an approach.
Going even further off-topic (par for the course for FD), does anyone have any ideas how they might create such a trojan (there seems to be no mention of self-replication in any of the articles) that could be recognized and ignored by AV software, but prevent others from using the same methodology to shield their malware?
RGDS
GARY
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 20340 Empire Blvd, Suite E-3, Bend, OR 97701
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel:+1(541)382-8588 Fax: +1(541)382-8676
-- John Hall Test Manager - Switch Team F5 Networks, Inc.
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
