> Interesting, yet, so far lacking in any real evidence that Idefense was > the force behind their demise. Is there something other then heresay and > conjecture to back up the claim?
nope. nothing concrete. then again, if it was a fabricated claim, wouldn't it make sense to fabricate 'evidence' as well? I am not saying the claim isn't bogus, because it may possibly be (though in my view quite unlikely). If the pressure came from a source other than idefense, then that should come out in the wash. If true then an apology should be made from roguesci and certainly from myself. however the goal of the original post will still be met - highlighting an offensive against a very popular full-disclosure site and forum. rant: (i'd not enjoy apologizing to idefense, as this would lend them some credibility as being worth apologizing to.. given their disgraceful behaviour and closed-shop, secret-club so-called 'alliance'.. taking full-disclosure information, turning it into a 'product' for their fee-paying members, then violating the principles of full-disclosure on their 'discoveries' for finacial gain. cheap.) regards ben _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
