On Sep 3, �ber GuidoZ ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed: UGZ: Easy sparky. Maybe it isn't his choice that he cannot release the EXE. UGZ: It's entirely possible, in fact, quite likely, that some "higher up" UGZ: who knows dick about IT and viruses got scared and said "This cannot UGZ: be shared with anyone! If it doesm you'll lose your job". Just because UGZ: they are worried about their image or that the file might contain UGZ: sensitive data. UGZ: UGZ: I have run into this situation MANY times. There is usually little you UGZ: can do about it as an IT staff member or a consultant. So the next UGZ: best thing - ask a group of people that might have a clue what's going UGZ: on, WITHOUT needing to see or analyze said file. UGZ: UGZ: Sheesh, give the guy a break. The only pollution I've noticed lately UGZ: is rude comments.
Aye, �ber is correct. When I first posted, I didnt have the EXE. When I did receive a copy of the file, I was told I cannot sent it outside of the network. Besides, Ive been on this list long enough to know that questions like mine are asked from time to time. On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 20:30:53 +0200 (CEST), A bitter Feher Tamas<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When the f*ck will people finally realize that it is NOT possible to say > anything about a file without actually having the file? > > If you wanna know what the f*ck this or that file is, go to and feed that > file here: > http://www.kaspersky.com/scanforvirus > > Less than 50 chars to remember and you can stop polluting this list. > Wow! > > Regards: Tamas Feher. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
