-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, 09.09.2004 at 08:13 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Steve Kudlak wrote: > >I'll ask my friend what he does as the "just don't do x" or just get > >rid of x never seems like a good idea. If you try to connect with > >telnet rather than ssh to that box it just doesn't go through. > > getting rid of telnetd is almost always a very good idea. Quite so, as I suggested. Are there even any legitimate uses for running a telnet daemon any more? (That is a genuine question - as far as I can see, SSH is always a perfect replacement). Dave. - -- Dave Ewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] Computing Manager, Epidemiology Unit, Oxford Cancer Research UK PGP: CC70 1883 BD92 E665 B840 118B 6E94 2CFD 694D E370 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBQBL8bpQs/WlN43ARAr0TAJ9N340MHUdsbQV3iiW2rD4sXWNjEwCg4/wm yh0Fe7/G58Dgu+pKoSJAtGM= =hCDd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
