~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Next time, please read the thread in context. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The context of the thread is that an application issue is being incorrectly interpreted as an OS issue. -ASB On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 14:43:53 -0400, Barry Fitzgerald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ASB wrote: > > >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > >Where issues like this relate to the OS is in the fact that the OS > >itself shouldn't be brought down by a poorly designed app. > >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > >And where in that article did you read that the OS was brought down by > >a poorly designed app? > > > > > > > I didn't... I was reponding to a point that was made about applications > being reponsible for system failures. > > > > >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > > >>Was it MS Windows that actually held the code that brought the system down? > >> > >> > >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > >The article was pretty clear: > > > ><snip> > > > >How you managed to read "OS failure" into this is rather astounding... > > > > > > > > > How you manage to get up in the morning is rather astounding. > > Next time, please read the thread in context. > > Also, if you think that that's a detailed assessment of the problem, > you're not too bright. > > So try and think a little harder next time, and not be so abbrassive. > You may be having a bad day (most likely due to your poor attitude) but > don't take your own misunderstanding out on others, mmkay? > > -Barry _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
