We have had this talk on FD before...just search for AV Naming in the archives....fun stuff.
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Hugo van der Kooij > Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 7:54 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SPAM] Fw: [Full-Disclosure] Joke.cpl ??? > > On Fri, 29 Oct 2004, Daniel Bachfeld wrote: > > > So far we have Bagle AQ, AT, AU, AY and BB for the same worm More > > proposals? > > > > This is the biggest divergence i've seen the last months. > Is there any > > reason, why the vendors could not agree on one name? We > already have > > CVE-entries and Bugtraq-IDs for vulnerabilities. > > So far I noticed at least two distinct files which were > detected as W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] (F-Prot) or Worm.Bagle.AT (ClamAV). > > Now I get freash trash Which is decoded as W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > (F-Prot) or Worm.Bagle.AX (ClamAV). > > I am under the impression it is not a single infection. > > But I share your sense of utter confusion. To which the > people of ClamAV have contributed way too much. (Noticed > their 'SomeFool'series?) > > Hugo. > > -- > I hate duplicates. Just reply to the relevant mailinglist. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://hvdkooij.xs4all.nl/ > Don't meddle in the affairs of magicians, > for they are subtle and quick to anger. > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
