n3td3v to me: > > In another thread Hugo van der Kooij wrote: > > Well why didn't you reply to the comment on the thread topic it was > post on, instead of splitting it into two, to further clog up the list > with a similar thread.
You must be a troll... First, you don't know what "419 scam" spam is, and now you ask a banally moronic question about list ettiquette... Anyway, in case you genuinely want to know (in which case I'm surprised your mommy helped you get subscribed to the list) I started a new thread because my question is actually about something quite unrelated to the original thread topic, _AND_ "your" thread was so stupid that most of those whose input I'd like in answer to my questions are likely to have stopped reading "your" thread. Before you make a chronically inane response to this message, think a little about who will see it, how much Email bandwidth will be wasted transmitting it to the whole list and what, on-balance the benefit of your comment will be. (Here's a tip to help you out -- had you Emailed me directly and asked why I forked a new thread, rather than sent your question to the whole list, it would have been obvious you were not a moron, but simply someone new to such lists and interested in how things work. In that case I'd have given you a much nicer reply...) Regards, Nick FitzGerald _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
