* Paul Schmehl: > --On Monday, November 15, 2004 07:25:58 PM +0100 Florian Weimer > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> <http://www.sbe.state.va.us/Election/Electoral_College.htm> >>> <http://www.usconstitution.net/consttop_elec.html> >>> <http://www.spies.com/Forums/showthread.php?threadid=404> >> >> And what's your point? > > If you want to understand how the electoral system works, read. Just > because you don't understand it doesn't mean it doesn't make sense.
At least one of these documents is factually incorrect. I fail to see how procedural details can shed some light on the current strange effects you are experiencing. Or do you think that if electors were assigned according to Hare-Niemeyer, the vote tallying problems would multiply? The Law of Large Numbers suggests it's far less likely that they could have actual election-deciding effect. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
