three cheers for fascism and bad [EMAIL PROTECTED] --vord
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 17:53:44 +0000, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 11:41:20 -0600, Todd Towles > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, it is given that posting to FD does give a site exposure (good and > > bad). But I wouldn't say that FD was the cause of it..it was the illegal > > activity that was the cause of it. We all know SCC does some underground > > stuff and they post here each time they move. So...I wouldn't blame the > > FD list for anything. > > I wouldn't use the word blame? I think its a good thing if > Full-Disclosure is helping to catch online criminals. I don't know if > you like malicious hackers and other criminals, but yeah.... I dislike > them. I would do anything in my power to stop online crime, from > scriptkiddie stuff, to sex stuff,spam,scams, fraud, terrorism and back > again. > > I have no space for anyone thinking they are elite and all the other > hacker scene crap. Its time to clamp down on the BS thats on the net. > > If I was in gov, I would shut a site down that looks remotely > hax0rish, even if they've done nothing wrong. All these crews and > hacker groups, fk them all. The net needs zero tollerence with online > crime. Govs should have the authority to close anything done because > they feel like it, without needing to prove shit. > > I would even close IRC channels. Hackphreak on undernet looks > harmless, but fk that. Close it anyway, its time to get a tighter grip > on things. > > > > Thanks,n3td3v > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
