> Anonymous? > > > Received: from [61.131.63.62] by web61208.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; > > Mon, 10 Jan 2005 18:13:49 PST
Yeah, I found that too. However, doing a Google search for public proxies revealed that IP# listed. (http://www.publicproxyservers.com/page1.html) I'll bet it's someone from this list who participated in the previous political debates and decided to share their thoughts without taking the backlash. Besides it being completely off-topic, it's also childish. If you *must* debate, at least participate. ;) Now they are sitting there jacking-off to the discussion we're having. I already emailed the abuse email address listed fromt he WHOIS lookup, though I only got back a canned response stating that they really don't care. So, I'm done with with thread. =) -- Peace. ~G On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:32:19 -0800 (PST), Eric Paynter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, January 10, 2005 10:53 pm, GuidoZ said: > > Hiding behind an anonymous Yahoo email address is pretty weak too. If you > > *really* need to express yourself so badly, at least reveal your identity. > > Anonymous? > > > Received: from [61.131.63.62] by web61208.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; > > Mon, 10 Jan 2005 18:13:49 PST > > inetnum: 61.131.0.0 - 61.131.127.255 > netname: CHINANET-FJ > descr: CHINANET Fujian province network > descr: Data Communication Division > descr: China Telecom > country: CN > > Not even American... No point in tracking him down further. It's clear the > agenda is not domestic. > > -Eric > > -- > arctic bears - email and dns services > http://www.arcticbears.com > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
