-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Dana Hudes wrote: | The report is good. Attaching the results in their entirety gives | spammers who don't have your technical capability, not to mention | script kiddies looking for victims for their viruses, a huge leg | up. Irresponsible doesn't begin to describe it.
So let's shut down full-disclosure.
| More appropriate would be specimens and a description of | methodology.
I informed the mailman developers about the problem more than a year ago and the number of vulnerable lists only increased:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg06853.html
If they don't spread the word someone else has to do it. I'm not worried about the 60,000 email addresses. They asked for being this example by being public. Let's hope this will make list admins secure the addresses which are only available to subscribers (which are a lot more).
Bye, Bernhard -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCChum9zL78+QhnUgRAoO8AJ9E3ph/U0Czys+Zx2Dorzx/AamfYACfaELr G+d9ospmfb902OzDZM4ci24= =wzz9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
