I've been scheming about different transports mechanism for Func (ActiveMQ, Pyro, etc...). I don't think Func is going to scale until the transport system is updated to something more robust than xmlrpc (and QMF looks like a good option).
I would be willing to spend significant development time on something like this. On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 7:48 AM, Michael DeHaan <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm sitting in a presentation right now for QMF ... looks rather slick. > > http://qpid.apache.org/qmf-python-console-tutorial.html > > It does sync, async, routing (like our delegation), publish/subscribe type > things, and offline delivery. I think the plan is to rely on kerberos for > security though, but perhaps you could also use certmaster. > > Func-over-QMF, anyone? (I know we talked about AMQP earlier, this is a > level above). > > I think Func's interest in the API, so the transport (and even certmaster) > may not be critical. Perhaps it could do both. > > --Michael > > _______________________________________________ > Func-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/func-list > -- Silas Sewell 720-863-4557 | www.silassewell.com
_______________________________________________ Func-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/func-list
