Ah - my motives are uncovered in a stroke. My coding skills are long put away.
Any efforts I put into that area would have a worse than negative effect I'm
afraid. I was merely attempting to rekindle some discussion on the topic due to
the serious advances that have been made with qpidd, QMF & AMQP. My
contributions to projects these days are limited to discussion and testing.
Duncan
On 16 September 2010 at 13:39 xor exor <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 2:01 PM, [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> <[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] >wrote:
>
> >
> > I've been looking for any information about using alternative messaging
> > buses for the backend of func and only found a short discussion back in Feb
> > 2009.
> >
> > http://www.redhat.com/archives/func-list/2009-February/msg00009.html
> >
> >
>
> Hi, one of my tasks in google summer of code 2009 (last summer) was to make
> func work over qmf. However on that date the qmf was not stable yet and python
> bindings were not complete. So there is no port of func on qmf as far as i
> know. I made a little experiment to make certmaster work on qmf which is here
> (the code is not synch with latest git repo) :
>
> http://github.com/makkalot/certmaster/tree/qpid-extreme
>
> It may give you some idea how the things can be done ...
>
>
> >
> > (Func over Apache QMF?)
> >
> > AMQP/QMF/qpid has come a long way since then and is close to a gold
> > (re?)release as part of Red Hat's MRG offering. As a means to offloading
> > the messaging complexity to another project? Using something that clearly
> > has a future as a corporate product?
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Duncan
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Func-list mailing list
> > [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/func-list
> >
>
_______________________________________________
Func-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/func-list
