Who said it was an octet?
BB
Krpata, Tyler wrote:
Nor do they support octets in IPv4 addresses that are greater than 8
bits...
-----Original Message-----
From: Blue Boar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 4:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [funsec] *groan*
Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah wrote:
OK, I'm thinking it's a subnet mask, and the significance of 255 is
easy to figure.
240 and 252 less so, but at least they are within range. But 257?
I have encountered many people who don't believe in non-contiguous
subnet masks. To be fair, a number of OSes don't support them anymore.
BB
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
