On Oct 27, 2006, at 11:24 PM, Nick FitzGerald wrote:
Then I guess we need more fascists. ; )
I don't think Larry did. I think his comment was toward the act not the system.
In no way does this contradict what Larry said. I think it may be a little extreme saying it is totally borked, but forgeries are an issue that all systems need to take into account. If the system doesn't, then that needs to be fixed.
Again, I don't think Larry or myself disagree with this.
Actually I think the two are very similar. Fraud is fraud. Saying something is technically fraud is the same as saying your girlfriend is slightly pregnant. It either is or it isn't. I personally have no problem with someone generating a single fake ticket that was only there to show that a fake was possible. Mark it as fake and make your point. But putting up a site that generates the tickets is to far. I think that we as an industry allow people way to much leeway when they assign themselves the title security researcher. Thanks Kevin --------------------- GCIA, GCIH BASE Project Lead The next step in IDS analysis! |
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
