On 11/1/06, Drsolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Brian Loe wrote:
>
> > On 11/1/06, Richard M. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > I suspect that the fake gun is what bothered the South Portland
> police and
> > > not the Bin Laden costume.
> >
> >
> > Could have swore that all toy guns were to have an orange muzzle for
> > just this reason. If his did have an orange muzzle, a lawsuit is in
> > order.
>
> My understanding was that all USians have the right to bear arms. The
> Constitution doesn't say anything about the colour of the muzzle. Surely
>
> he has a case anyway?
>
> ---> Yes we do, but there is also the matter of "brandishing a
> firearm". Which is what this idiot was doing, even though it was fake.
> There are robberies that take place often enough with toy guns that look
> real, it's still "armed robbery" regardless if it was real or not. Same
> as brandishing a firearm.
OK, so carrying a firearm is legal, but brandishing it isn't. OK, got it
now.
Brandishing is when you wave something, right? So you're allowed to carry
firearms, but you mustn't wave them.
I never got that either,
As long as its not concealed, arent you allowed to walk around with a gun?
-JP
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
