On 3/21/07, Richard M. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <SNIP>
Consumer Reports had reported in January that side-impact tests showed 10 of 12 car seats performed poorly in tests conducted at 38 miles an hour. But it later said the tests had actually been conducted at 70 miles an hour.
<SNIP>
For my money, I still only want one of the 2 that didn't fail at 70mph. Seems like a non-issue issue. Rather than retract the article they could have simly clarified the failure in their testing, right? _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
