-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- -- "Alex Eckelberry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Ferg, you have a good point - it is up to each organization to choose
>what category is listed. Hence, if there was a filtering category of
>"politics", then one would reasonably assume sites like
>LittleGreenFootballs to be listed.  
>
>However, it would nice to see if sites are actually in a filtering list
>-- in other words, enter a site and see what web filters view the site
>as, even breaking out by what category.  But perhaps this is just not
>realistic. 

My personal experience has been such that you have to be a
subscriber to the specific products' "feed" on a subscription
basis to see how specific content is categorized.

$.02,

- - ferg

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.0 (Build 214)

wj8DBQFGFHCFq1pz9mNUZTMRAki8AJ4zupZ7n5Y6cbvoZPAriVBJMmFDlACguXHZ
wNuYSqCL0pVlQFUI4qLjfe4=
=pprQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawg(at)netzero.net
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/


_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

Reply via email to