[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Is anyone else on the list using Outlook 2007? Are you seeing more problems > with it vs. Outlook 2003? > > The reason I'm asking is because the new Outlook 2007 HTML editor is giving > me grief. The latest problem is that Outlook 2007 crashed when I tried to > convert an email messaging I was composing from HTML to plain text. The > editor also messes up the formatting of some Web pages when pasting them > into an new email message. I see the problem a lot at the Boston Globe Web > site (www.boston.com). > > Also some old bugs weren't fixed. For example, Outlook 2007 editor still > does not handle Web pages with frames. It also messes up the formatting of > plain text Web pages when emailing them from Internet Explorer.
I gather you missed all the brouhaha about OL2k7 moving to using Word (exclusively?) for its HTML handling? Much as I dislike IE and the machinations they had to perform to make it vaguely "safe" to use as the HTML wrangler for a MUA, obviously moving to Word is a seriously retrograde step for all manner of security and usability reasons... Of course, your question suggests you care, so that begs the question of why _ANYONE_ with half a concern for security and usability issues would ever choose to use OL for their MUA in the first place. Regards, Nick FitzGerald _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
