On 7/13/07, Dude VanWinkle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/13/07, Paul Ferguson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> - -- "Dude VanWinkle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >AOL and Yahoo probably have to most incentive for reducing spam.
> >Consider how much of storage their storage is dedicated to spam? 10%?
> >40%? How much of their bandwidth is used for the same? Thats a lot of
> >profit to be harvested for just doing the right thing.
>
> For what its worth, Yahoo! deployed DKIM into Yahoo! mail in
> 2004:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DomainKeys
>
> ...and:
>
> http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# nslookup
> set type=txt
> aol.com
Server: 68.87.68.162
Address: 68.87.68.162#53
Non-authoritative answer:
aol.com text = "v=spf1 ip4:152.163.225.0/24 ip4:205.188.139.0/24
ip4:205.188.144.0/24 ip4:205.188.156.0/23 ip4:205.188.159.0/24
ip4:64.12.136.0/23 ip4:64.12.138.0/24 ptr:mx.aol.com ?all"
aol.com text = "spf2.0/pra ip4:152.163.225.0/24 ip4:205.188.139.0/24
ip4:205.188.144.0/24 ip4:205.188.156.0/23 ip4:205.188.159.0/24
ip4:64.12.136.0/23 ip4:64.12.138.0/24 ptr:mx.aol.com ?all"
of course the ?all shows how much faith they put into it lol
-JP<who thinks RFC's should exclude wishy-washy>
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
