On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:26:16 -0000, Paul Ferguson said: > I agree that ICANN's WHOIS policy shift would be akin to criminal > negligence.
What do you think of the concept of "domain tasting with proper whois"? :) (Yes, I think domain tasting and this ICANN move regarding whois are both large crocks of bovine-based fertilizer. I *could*, in a better world, support the concept of "special circumstances" as Computerworld mentioned - except that to make it *useful*, ICANN and the bottom-feeding registrars would have to collectively grow some testicles. Otherwise, every phisher and spammer would file for "political dissident" status (hey - they disagree with the politics that passes laws that prohibit their behavior. They're dissidents :) Except for the few that will claim to be running "Homes for battered domains" :)
pgpfHanyT0MF0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
