I don't run the MacOS or RedHat so their product quality issues don't
affect me.  However, I do run Windows XP and its product quality problems
do affect me alot.  I was just reviewing my update history on my work
laptop and discovered that 20 or so secrutiy patches didn't install
properly back in Feb. 2007.  Yikes.  What do I do now?  Does anyone know
what hex error code 0x80246002 means?  Seesh!

Is anyone else seeing silent Windows Update failures?  Here's where to check:

   http://www.update.microsoft.com/microsoftupdate/v6/default.aspx?ln=en-us

Back in June, my home PC locked up for 30 minutes each day due to bogus
update to Windows Update engine.  A patch for the update finally fixed the
problem.

Richard


> This has nothing to do with the number of updates, but the fact that
> everyone was applying them at roughly the same time. They could have 1
> update a month on their regular schedule and the effect, from Skype's
> standpoint, would be the same.
>
> And some would dispute your claims about the number of updates
> (http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2007/08/16/july-2007-operatin
> g-system-vulnerability-scorecard.aspx ), at least as compared to the
> competition. Do MacOS and RedHat have too many updates too?
>
> Larry Seltzer
> eWEEK.com Security Center Editor
> http://security.eweek.com/
> http://blogs.eweek.com/cheap_hack/
> Contributing Editor, PC Magazine
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 11:17 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [funsec] Did Windows Update take out the Skype network?
>
> Here's the official Skype blog entry on the meltdown:
>
>    http://heartbeat.skype.com/2007/08/what_happened_on_august_16.html
>
> In my book, there are way too many security patches for Windows.  The
> Skype meltdown is an example of collateral damage.
>
> Another problem that I've seen with Microsoft Update since the beginning
> of this summer is that a collection of Office 2003 patches fail to
> install and everytime I reboot my computer Microsoft Update attempts the
> install again and fails again.  I'm never notified of these failures and
> I'm not sure how to fix the problem in order to secure my system.
>
> Richard
>
>
>> I hope they don't have the gall actually to blame Microsoft for it.
>> Obviously it's a flaw in their network, and shows a hole in their own
>> testing.
>>
>> Perhaps it's also an indication that more Windows users are updating
>> more quickly.
>>
>> Larry Seltzer
>> eWEEK.com Security Center Editor
>> http://security.eweek.com/
>> http://blogs.eweek.com/cheap_hack/
>> Contributing Editor, PC Magazine
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 10:26 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: [funsec] Did Windows Update take out the Skype network?
>>
>> http://blog.wired.com/monkeybites/2007/08/windows-update-.html
>>
>> Skype is finally back online after a massive two-day outage which
>> began on Thursday, August 16th and rendered the VoIP service useless
>> for an estimated 220 million users. As we reported on Friday, Skype
>> has denied charges that the outage was the result of an attack, but
>> the company delayed an official explanation until today.
>>
>> According to Skype the outage was caused by a massive number of users
>> restarting their machines, which flooded the Skype network with login
>> requests. Skype blames the restarts on Windows Update, presumably
>> large numbers of users rebooting after installing this month's "Patch
> Tuesday"
>> Windows patches.
>>
>> ...
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
>> https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
>> Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
>> https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
>> Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
> https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
> Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
>

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

Reply via email to