On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 14:15:48 +0200, Florian Weimer said: > Well, it seems to me that the current model is almost at the one > extreme of what is under consideration (regarding mandatory > disclosure). But in my experience, even today, domain WHOIS data > lacks almost any operational value. There doesn't seem to be any room > for improvement, and it can't get much worse, so I don't care either > way. 8-/
Once upon a time, the 'Technical Contact' was often a good way to get in touch with a domain if their postmaster/hostmaster/security/abuse addresses were brokken. These days, it's safe to assume that the average clue level at the other end has dropped low enough that it's not worth my time to tell the site they have a problem - it's more productive to just null-route the offenders.
pgp4FKdh8uvUf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
