On 8/29/07, Drsolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, I've done that. No-one got killed. Then I banned guns in the UK, and > our murder rate was suddenly one twentyth of the USA.
So you're claiming that murders with firearms went DOWN after the ban? See, I told you they avoid all contact with truth. > > And I have a theory about how this works. My theory goes like this - when > you have a lot less guns in the population, you get a lot less people > being killed by guns. > > Let me know what you think of that theory. I think its not much of a theory - since it defies the facts, for one, and for another, it has no effect what-so-ever on the murder rate. And you are justifying the ban based on the murder rate, right? You're not just some dictator-wannabe that hates guns for no real reason, right? > > Anyway - I'm all in favour of having lots of guns in America. That's > because I never go there. Good. Keep up the support. I'll gladly set up a PayPal account for your donations to my gun purchasing fund. > Healing the effect sounds good to me. When I fell into a bed of nettles > and ow ow ow, the cream I put on my arm worked so much better than cutting > down all the nettles. And because your way of thinking doesn't allow you to consider anything deeper or worse than nettles you will always come to a bad conclusion a matters that require deeper thought. Cancer, for instance. Treating the symptoms of cancer (pick your cancer, pick your symptoms) does not eradicate the cancer, end result: you still die of cancer. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
