On Wed, 29 Aug 2007, Brian Loe wrote: > On 8/29/07, Drsolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > No, I was simply challenging the idea that so many people have, that the > > USA was founded on the principle of "liberty for all". This is part of an > > ongoing education process to help you understand your history and culture. > > Thanks, but no thanks. "Liberty for All" means exactly what we say it > means
It means whatever your bosses decide it means. And it changes like the weather. Fact is, your country was not founded on "liberty for all", under any reasonable definition of "all". - and it has since the beginning. Because we didn't acknowledge > some people as fully human (much like your own country for a much Yes, they did recognise them as human, and possessed of a soul. > longer time) doesn't detract from that. We figured it out. We're over > it, and millions of immigrants have enjoyed that Liberty for All > since. Actually, you haven't figured it out yet. "Liberty for all" still doesn't mean "all", by any reasonable definition. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
