Heh. Huung out with Steve Gibson for many years ... Gadi? Feh. I'll take his tent down any day. :)
At 07:36 AM 9/24/07, Charles PICKENS wrote: >Hmm... > >I think to myself something about stones and glass houses. > >Perhaps a bit of introspection is in order? Perhaps a trip to thy local >English classroom as well (not to pick nits but some of you diatribe is >impossible to understand due to a lack of proper syntax, word usage, spelling >and grammar). > >You would be far more effective in your critique if you had some either: >0) Positive contributions of you own to reference (get it... 0?) >1) A valid point to you exposition >2) Elevated you level of discourse above that of a 8-year old playground bully > >This is meant to be positive (i.e.: constructive) criticism > > but given your past contributions, Im sure Ill see something along the >lines of Is that all you can do? Critisize my english? I dont got time to us >a speel cheker. ENGLISH ISNT MY FIRST LANGUGE ANYWAY! >Flame away. > > >________________________________________ >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of n3td3v [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: September 22, 2007 9:36 AM >To: [email protected] >Subject: [funsec] Gadi Evron strikes again > >Who seen Gadi Evron on the mailing lists trolling about what a 0day is >and what a 0day isn't, in the middle of a serious disclosure about a >PDF flaw? > >Hilarious. > >Well, just incase you missed it, here it is again... > >http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2007/Sep/0229.html > >And this guy wants to be a high profile guy at the forefront of >information security discussion? > >lolzers. > >Script kiddos unite behind the big man Evron. > >He leads, where the rest of us follow. > >And he comes on the lists complaining people are mimicing his e-mail >addresses and calling him a dick. *I wonder why?* > >Its funny, he strongly keeps an eye on Funsec mailing list and keeps >everyone in check,Yet, he has a total disregard for "quality control" >else where, especially on Bugtraq!!!!!!!! > >My question is "Who is Gadi Evron?". > >This guy you would think would add something special to a discussion, >but he doesn't, and you know what I know his excuse is? He is keeping >his knowledge secret so bad guys can't learn from his knowledge. > >lolzers Gadi Evron. > >The truth is, Gadi just wants to make sure his name and e-mail address >is in every major flaw disclosure, no matter how lame the comment is, >just as long as his name and e-mail is in high profile disclosures, >then Gadi Evron can sleep at night. > >Thanks Gadi!!! My hero. > >Bugtraq is moderated for a reason, so Bugtraq moderators, start >moderating it!!! Symantec arsewipes. > >Securityfocus, no really, why are you allowing Gadi Evron troll on >such a high profile respected moderated list? Gadi's comment mentioned >above was a true breach of the rules, so start moderating his comments >more in future. > >Leave the trolling for F-D Gadi, Bugtraq readers don't want to see >your shit in future, and Bugtraq moderators, actually read what Gadi >Evron is posting in future, instead of just reading the name and >sender and approving the message without actually reading the body. > >*Oh its Gadi, its automatically approved* > >Lets look at Bugtraq's description: > >"BugTraq is a full disclosure moderated mailing list for the >*detailed* discussion and announcement of computer security >vulnerabilities: what they are, how to exploit them, and how to fix >them. " http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/description#0.1.1 > >lolzers, Bugtraq moderators don't read thier own shit or inforce it! > >Someone snip a bit of that description that gives Gadi right of way to >troll on Bugtraq in the middle of serious flaw disclosures!!!!! > >Gadi, seriously f**king learn about the stuff you read , so you can >actually input into the threads and help with the topic infront of >you, instead of random off-topic messages about what defines a 0-day >and what doesn't. > >Why didn't you start your own thread on Bugtraq about "what is a >0-day?", because they wouldn't let you!!!! Instead you sneak your shit >into high profile threads, to get a name for yourself. > >Your conversation, as always Gadi, is best suited for Full-Disclosure >or security-basics, so get the f*** off Bugtraq you idiot. >_______________________________________________ >Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. >https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec >Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. > >_______________________________________________ >Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. >https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec >Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. ---------------------------------------------------- Kevin McAleavey, at your service. BOClean Anti-Malware division http://www.comodo.com/ _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
