On 9/27/07, Ken Dyke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 10:43:49AM -0500, Brian Loe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On 9/27/07, Ken Dyke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > China and Russia have their own satellites, so google earth is not > > > telling them anything they don't already know. > > > > What about the Iranians? > > The Iranians? I am supposed to be OK with all the things the Bush > regime is doing because the Iranians might attack the United States? > > Fear mongering is an insufficient excuse. Do better.
What the fuck are you talking about? I couldn't care less if you're afraid of Bush or the Iranians or your mother! I also said nothing about Bush and really, REALLY couldn't care less about your opinion of him, therefore I would not invite them. My point was quite simple: Iranians don't have satellites, they might find satellite imagery, even the low level stuff available on the 'Net, helpful. As would a terrorist cell already in the US and planning a raid on a military base. Further, if there is RESERVED and RESTRICTED federal airspace above all military bases - as I said I believed there is - then they should also restrict this access *as best they can*. And someone early on in this thread mentioned aerial photography, for some unknown reason, which federal airspace removes the possibility of (just like the controlled airspace over federally controlled airports), satellite is best you're going to get. If you want to twist those comments into a political statement, feel free, but leave me out of it since I'm NOT making a political statement! _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
