On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:45:18 EDT, der Mouse said: > > OK, I admit it, I don't understand the concept of non-protected > > low-class speech. As I read the decision in 'People vs. Larry > > Flynt', the US Supreme Court doesn't recognize such a beast either, > > so I'm in good company... > > Um, the SCOTUS decision says no such thing exists in the USA (or, let > us be precise, existed at the time). This is a very different thing > from not understanding the concept; if they didn't understand the > concept they couldn't have said anything coherent about it at all.
Right, and if it doesn't exist, that would explain why I don't understand the non-existent thing. Which is what I said. ;)
pgpUbFdCnWNG3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
