> from would-be whistleblowers in the Justice Department. The U.S. attorney > firings scandal had shown that much was amiss in the Department, and with > the danger of retaliation very real, the committee had set up a form on the > committee's website for people to blow the whistle privately about abuses
Lie or bias? If this is a scandal, what was it when Clinton fired the entire department? > addresses revealed in the email. Some of the email addresses appear to be > transparently fake, but there's also, much more troubling, a > [EMAIL PROTECTED] carbon copied on the email, which is the > public email address for Vice President Dick Cheney. In other words, an > email containing the email addresses of all the whistleblowers who had > written in to the committee tipline was sent to public email address of Vice > President Cheney. This is only "troubling" if you're stupid enough to believe Cheney has ever visited this site and submitted "his" e-mail address OR that you actually believe Cheney checks, watches or cares about the e-mail he receives at this address. In other words, its "troubling" if you're stupid. But then this whole story is only predicated on a "scandal" if your stupid enough to buy into the lame-dick demo's spin. Oh damn, was this is another political post to funsec? Trolling? _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
