Let me be more general here. I'm writing on this again and if you can give me references to other examples I'd appreciate it
Larry Seltzer eWEEK.com Security Center Editor http://security.eweek.com/ http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/ Contributing Editor, PC Magazine [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: Larry Seltzer Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2007 8:00 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[email protected]' Subject: RE: [funsec] More info on malware-scan.com ads on newspaper Web sites (resending without the "*SPAM*" that I think my spamassassin put into the subject line.) Larry Seltzer eWEEK.com Security Center Editor http://security.eweek.com/ http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/ Contributing Editor, PC Magazine [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: Larry Seltzer Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2007 7:59 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [email protected] Subject: RE: *SPAM* [funsec] More info on malware-scan.com ads on newspaper Web sites You mentioned the Herald. There was a malware ad on them? I don't see a reference Larry Seltzer eWEEK.com Security Center Editor http://security.eweek.com/ http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/ Contributing Editor, PC Magazine [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 8:44 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: *SPAM* [funsec] More info on malware-scan.com ads on newspaper Web sites At the Boston Herald, the Russian malware ad seemed to come from a Flash ad which was originated from advertising.com, an ad network, and not the Herald themselves. I will be checking with advertising.com to see what they know. Richard > I'm not sure why the ad networks would need to do anything. You'd > think, OTOH, that publishers like YNet would drop ads that included > the redirects, especially since they're taking the user away from the > publication. At this point I blame Ynet more than the ad network. It's > sort of like the womany who refuses to leave the husband who's beating > her. > > Larry Seltzer > eWEEK.com Security Center Editor > http://security.eweek.com/ > http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/ > Contributing Editor, PC Magazine > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 8:09 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: *SPAM* [funsec] More info on malware-scan.com ads on > newspaper Web sites > > Yep, looks like the same sleazebags. Any idea what the ad networks > are doing about this problem? > > Richard > >> I reported on something similar at Ynetnews (see >> http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/2007/11/and_suddenly_some_strang >> e >> _site.php) about a week ago. I wonder if it's the same ad network. >> >> The Ynet attacks persist. They knew about it probably at least 10 >> days ago and I saw it again yesterday, this time in Firefox. >> >> Larry Seltzer >> eWEEK.com Security Center Editor >> http://security.eweek.com/ >> http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/ >> Contributing Editor, PC Magazine >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> - >> ---------- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 6:38 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: *SPAM* [funsec] More info on malware-scan.com ads on >> newspaper Web sites >> >> >> Holy sh**. >> >> Richard >> >> >> http://www.azstarnet.com/business/209714 >> >> Maliciously coded online ad caused Star's Web site problems >> >> By Jack Gillum >> >> ARIZONA DAILY STAR >> >> Tucson, Arizona | Published: 11.03.2007 >> >> advertisement >> >> >> >> A maliciously coded online advertisement was responsible for causing >> problems for Tucson Newspapers' Web sites this week, the company said >> Friday. >> >> >> >> The ads, which the company said were purchased with a fraudulent >> credit-card number, directed some Web visitors to sites that could >> have installed harmful software, or "malware." >> >> >> >> The problem was reported Wednesday by the Pima County Department of >> Environmental Quality, which advised its employees not to visit the >> Arizona Daily Star Web site over computer-safety concerns. When their >> employees visited the Star's site, anti-virus software alerted them >> of trouble. >> >> >> >> The fraudulent ad purchase was discovered Wednesday and the ad was >> removed Thursday, said Susan Hardin, director of online for Tucson >> Newspapers, which is jointly owned by the Arizona Daily Star and >> Tucson Citizen newspapers. >> >> >> >> Hardin said the ads in question were bought by a company called >> ForceUp, which could not be reached for comment because a phone >> number for the company at an Idaho area code was disconnected, and an >> e-mail contact form was inaccessible. >> >> >> >> Affected users were redirected to a different site and then presented >> with fake virus-scanning software that was itself malicious software. >> >> >> >> Hardin recommends that users block access to malwarealarm.com, >> newbieadguide.com, and malware-scan.com, and delete infected files >> from a computer's PC and Windows registry. >> >> >> >> Tucson Newspapers previously said that some video advertisements may >> have been the problem. But as of Friday, the company narrowed down >> the problem to the suspect ads, which Hardin said were up in the >> morning hours for the last 10 to 18 days. >> >> >> >> "This hasn't happened before, and our people reacted very quickly," >> said Tucson Newspapers President and CEO Mike Jameson. "We'll just >> have to be more vigilant in the future about these things." >> >> >> >> The ad, Tucson Newspapers said, circulated to other newspaper sites >> across the country. >> >> >> >> â- Contact reporter Jack Gillum at 573-4178 or at >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. >> https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec >> Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. >> > > _______________________________________________ > Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. > https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec > Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. > _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
