On 11/13/07, Dude VanWinkle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 12, 2007 9:43 PM, silky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 11/13/07, Dude VanWinkle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Nov 12, 2007 9:11 PM, silky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > is this really news? > > > > > > No, but if doubleclick is messing up then well we are kinda screwed. I > > > just thought it was funny, even if unavoidable :-) > > > > > > On Nov 12, 2007 9:11 PM, silky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> also wrote: > > > > orly? > > > On Nov 12, 2007 9:11 PM, Dude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> didn't get it <whoosh!>: > > > > > > > > > > let's also not forget that ad's themselves are viral in nature. > > > > tricking us into trusting the products they promote so that they can > > > > exploit our wallets ... > > > > > > Ahh the benefits of applied psychology: It only works on the weak of > > > mind.. > > > > sadly the weak of mind have the same voting rights as the rest of us; > > if not the majority vote. > > But they are easy to control, so we have no excuses for being beaten > by two parties of morons..
not so easy to control. there are certain types of people who aren't open to new ideas, and aren't willing to investigate the reasons behind things; so old tricks work on them - like scare-mongering. anyway, lets not turn this into a political debate. my point was that advertising isn't some holy thing that needs to be protected, imho :) > -JP > -- mike http://lets.coozi.com.au/ _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
