I thought it was security related. I've made it a point, you should note, not to bite on any of the bait that has been posted. I've always stated that my intent, in any of my posts, was not to attack or even comment, but rather defend what would otherwise go undefended and applauded by the choir. I think I've done reasonably well controlling myself in that regard with only a few slip-ups.
That said, THIS post was nothing more than a story to do with security and electronic warfare. Who's politics was it when we were discussing what looked like digital warfare against Estonia? Isn't this you commenting on that very topic: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/29/technology/29estonia.html?_r=1&oref=slogin? Would I not find funsec posts, from you, in regards to the same subject? What is the "sec" in funsec these days? And isn't "fun" up to the perception of the reader? On Nov 24, 2007 4:38 PM, Gadi Evron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is that US or Israeli politics? > > Funsec is not the place. > > On Sat, 24 Nov 2007, Brian Loe wrote: > > > http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story.jsp?id=news/ISRA112107.xml&headline=U.S.%20Electronic%20Surveillance%20Monitored%20Israeli%20Attack%20On%20Syria&channel=defense > > > > The U.S. provided Israel with information about Syrian air defenses > > before Israel attacked a suspected nuclear site in Syria, Aviation > > Week & Space Technology is reporting in its Nov. 26 edition. > > > > The U.S. was monitoring the electronic emissions coming from Syria > > during Israel's Sept. 6 attack, and while there was no active American > > engagement in the operation, there was advice provided, according to > > military and aerospace industry officials. > > > > The first event in the raid involved Israel's strike aircraft flying > > into Syria without alerting Syrian air defenses. The ultimate target > > was a suspected nuclear reactor being developed at Dayr az-Zawr. But > > the main attack was preceded by an engagement with a single Syrian > > radar site at Tall al-Abuad near the Turkish border. > > _______________________________________________ > > Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. > > https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec > > Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. > > > _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
