Oh lordy. PC comes to funsec. So a government order blocking an entire Web site isn't a cyberattack? If some criminal-types from Russia DoSed YouTube it would be front page news.
I also wonder why YouTube agreed with the Pakistani government order and removed the video so that no one can see it *anywhere*. (Of course, YouTube routinely censors videos all the time for a variety of reasons.) Richard -----Original Message----- From: Paul Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 10:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [funsec] Cyberattack from the Pakistani government? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The subject line of this message is clearly inflammatory and based on wild supposition. Do not attribute to malice what can be explained by ignorance. All evidence points to a genuine mistake prompted by an edict to block YouTube: http://www.renesys.com/blog/2008/02/pakistan_hijacks_youtube_1.shtml - - ferg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.3 (Build 3017) wj8DBQFHwuFnq1pz9mNUZTMRAmCpAKDlM/1I0Ao0sTkAqSuk5I6MtVZONwCeL4hU e6WVIA3Gb5KWh8kaLna7ZtI= =+bx2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg(at)netzero.net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
