-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - -- "Richard M. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I just don't see the big deal here. Developers can create insecure >applications in most any programming language. Why pick on AIR? I'm not picking on AIR -- I was simply mentioning that this is yet another emerging Web 2.0 technology which may introduce additional security concerns. I hope I'm wrong, but I'm not the only person who sees the unfortunate possibilities: http://www.symantec.com/enterprise/security_response/weblog/2008/02/running _on_air.html Cheers, - - ferg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.3 (Build 3017) wj8DBQFHwyGDq1pz9mNUZTMRAokWAKCoVfeL2q1gkHHvxFBjlvftR7Zv4QCeMt87 r6OVSQr+5ebFwVwCHRCG9V0= =H6Jf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg(at)netzero.net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
